Voting is NOW OPEN for the Suckiest Logo Contest

Posted on November 10, 2008 
Filed Under Freebies, Graphic Design, Special Events

Now that the 2008 presidential election is over and America has chosen our next president-elect, it is now time to vote in the Signature Worx Suckiest Logo Contest. I know…probably not quite as exciting as watching Obama and McCain battle it out last week, but for one lucky contestant, your votes will not only completely transform their business image by receiving a brand new logo for free, but they won’t have to add to the national deficit in order to get it.

We have six worthy contestants competing for a coveted new logo from Signature Worx.  Of course this requires audience participation so we need your help to determine the winner. Cast your votes between now and Wednesday, November 19th. You can vote as many times as you wish so be sure to check back to see how your top pick is doing.

Here’s a preview of our contestants’ logos, but you can read what they had to say on the voting page.

Ropes

So what does the winner receive? The worst logo (as decided by our readers) will be ditched for a completely new, 100% custom-designed Signature Logo. Of course we realize that re-branding their business can get expensive, and they should be compensated for having been mocked by their peers. Therefore, the winner of the Suckiest Logo Contest will also receive their choice of the following:

Voting ends November 19th so be sure to vote for your favorite suckiest logo by then!

UPDATE! Voting has ended. Results will be posted soon!

Similar Posts:

Share/Save/Bookmark

| del.icio.us | Digg it | Furl | iFeedReaders | ma.gnolia | reddit | StumbleUpon | Wink | Yahoo MyWeb

Comments

One Response to “Voting is NOW OPEN for the Suckiest Logo Contest”

  1. And the Winner is… : In The Worx on November 20th, 2008 4:56 pm

    [...] We had a huge following for our Suckiest Logo Contest over the past week and a half. But as with everything else, the contest has come to an end and our [...]

Leave a Reply